<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groupware!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karon</title>
		<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27486</link>
		<dc:creator>Karon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27486</guid>
		<description>Open-Xchange is a good option. They do have a free / open source version on the community website (codename: Hyperion &#38; OX Server 0.8.x). It doesn't come with support, updates like the commercial version does, but it is still an excellent product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open-Xchange is a good option. They do have a free / open source version on the community website (codename: Hyperion &amp; OX Server 0.8.x). It doesn&#8217;t come with support, updates like the commercial version does, but it is still an excellent product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Feygin</title>
		<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27377</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Feygin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27377</guid>
		<description>Don't see a single reason for an on-premises calendar solution any more. Take Google Apps for Your Domain, Zimbra, Zoho or any of the other hosted options. You get all the same features, if not more (hCalendar feeds, integration APIs, etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t see a single reason for an on-premises calendar solution any more. Take Google Apps for Your Domain, Zimbra, Zoho or any of the other hosted options. You get all the same features, if not more (hCalendar feeds, integration APIs, etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Orelio</title>
		<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Orelio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27361</guid>
		<description>There's a post on this blog about a recent, positive experience with Zimbra, both with intallation and a Zimbra hosting provider.

&lt;a href="http://www.devtao.com/2007/10/02/Good+Riddance+Outlook+Hello+Zimbra.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;Post about Zimbra&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a post on this blog about a recent, positive experience with Zimbra, both with intallation and a Zimbra hosting provider.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.devtao.com/2007/10/02/Good+Riddance+Outlook+Hello+Zimbra.aspx" rel="nofollow">Post about Zimbra</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan K.</title>
		<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2007/10/09/289#comment-27353</guid>
		<description>Zimbra's calendar is free and full-featured, but if you install from source you're probably still going to have some headaches.  The 5.0 version handles the calendar-only situation (no mail) much better than 4.5, from what I hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zimbra&#8217;s calendar is free and full-featured, but if you install from source you&#8217;re probably still going to have some headaches.  The 5.0 version handles the calendar-only situation (no mail) much better than 4.5, from what I hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
