<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SATA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2005/08/sata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2005/08/sata/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonard</title>
		<link>http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2005/08/sata/#comment-3617</link>
		<dc:creator>leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darkness.codefu.org/wordpress/2005/08/20/202#comment-3617</guid>
		<description>Hey, it sounds like we&#039;re doing some similar research right now...  

If you&#039;re going RAID-5, I definitely recommending still doing backups to a separate unit / archival storage. I just had two drives die on my old 0.7TB RAID-5 system, which makes it pretty much a total loss (I&#039;m considering paying for data recovery...).

My new setup will be all RAID 1, with a separate RAID 1 backup unit, and spending some time writing a good backup solution (surprisingly I haven&#039;t been able to find a good program that will do good rsyncing, diffing/incrementals, aging/pruning, and  archival/cataloguing).

I&#039;m going w/ eSATA not multilane (as you mentioned, those are rather finicky right now).  I&#039;m not worried about SATA II as things are way too much in flux until the real 2.5 spec gets finalized.

As far as drives, I&#039;m looking most closely at the WD WD4000YR for its high MTBF, but will probably mix and match with some Seagate 7200.8&#039;s (I&#039;ll be using SW RAID so I can have different drive brands - that whole trying to avoid simultaneous spontaneous failure thing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it sounds like we&#8217;re doing some similar research right now&#8230;  </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going RAID-5, I definitely recommending still doing backups to a separate unit / archival storage. I just had two drives die on my old 0.7TB RAID-5 system, which makes it pretty much a total loss (I&#8217;m considering paying for data recovery&#8230;).</p>
<p>My new setup will be all RAID 1, with a separate RAID 1 backup unit, and spending some time writing a good backup solution (surprisingly I haven&#8217;t been able to find a good program that will do good rsyncing, diffing/incrementals, aging/pruning, and  archival/cataloguing).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going w/ eSATA not multilane (as you mentioned, those are rather finicky right now).  I&#8217;m not worried about SATA II as things are way too much in flux until the real 2.5 spec gets finalized.</p>
<p>As far as drives, I&#8217;m looking most closely at the WD WD4000YR for its high MTBF, but will probably mix and match with some Seagate 7200.8&#8242;s (I&#8217;ll be using SW RAID so I can have different drive brands &#8211; that whole trying to avoid simultaneous spontaneous failure thing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

